The Inner Circle

For this article I could use an abstraction for showing the close interaction and decision making.

The point of this article is one to be able to find the difference and from that point on, to distinguish the inner circle and outer circle.

The initial yellow circle A (inner circle of the self) remains a part of its root A1 (orange) circle in its close interactions.

The initial red circle B (inner circle of the self) remains a part of its root B1 (pink) circle in its close interactions.

There is a lot in common with the initial yellow A and the initial red B circles and hence, they unite and they have been united in a major unit – the dark orange circle C.

The initial yellow circle A has in common with the root pink circle B1 only in relation to its similarity with the initial red circle B. Since the initial red circle B is from the root pink circle B1, for everyone’s well-being it is fair the initial red B and the initial yellow A circle to notice and respect the differences in the root pink B1 and in the root orange A1 circles.

The initial red circle B has in common with the root orange circle B1 only in relation to its similarity with the initial yellow circle A. Since the initial yellow circle A is from the root orange circle A1, for everyone’s well-being it is fair the initial yellow A and the initial red circle B to notice and respect the differences in the root pink B1 and in the root orange A1 circles.

The area in common between the root orange A1 and the root pink B1 circles is not only the initial red B and initial A yellow’s circle area, but the whole dark orange area C.

In other words, when 2 humans, namely the initial circle A and the initial circle B, are together, their similarities build a new unit – their relationship. Human A (initial yellow circle) remains an heir of A1’s roots (root orange circle), and human B (initial red circle) remains an heir of B1’s roots (root pink circle). The relationship between A and B is the dark orange circle C. So, the similarities between root pink B1 circle and the root orange A1 circle are bigger than the area inside both initial circles – it is the whole dark orange circle C. From my perspective any denial of this situation is causing stress in everyone involved. And here everyone is involved. This is my receipt for a successful marriage/ partnership – remember that everyone is a representative of another family (root circle), when both, one and another one, are about to build a new family unit (dark orange circle C). Do not require your partner to become your parent or sibling (A to pretend to be from B1 and B to pretend to be from A1) – notice and respect the distance, provided by the different root circles.

There are many ways for assessing the actions of an individual. One of them is the behavior science. This science doesn’t care about one’s root circles or in other words, one’s reasons. It cares about the very reaction towards everything, surrounding certain individual.

If one’s self is the orange A1 and other human’s self is pink B1, than the similarities are the initial circles yellow and red and these are situated in between A1 and B1. In this case the major white circle C1 is equal to the dark orange circle C, meaning it is the same circle expression of the relationship. Therefore, the reasons of A1 (the whole dark orange circle C with the red B and the yellow A initiate circles) are not apparent to B1 – they remain inside A1’s self. Only by the care or the lack of care towards the major white circle’s C1 well-being, B1 would know if A1 is on the same page with B1. And the same applies vise versa. The reasons for any reaction of B1 are not apparent to A1 (the whole dark orange circle C with the red B and the yellow A initiate circles), because they remain inside B1’s self.

One’s reasoning is not always visible and comprehensible to everyone, but the supportive or destructive the angelic image of the unit/ family/ partnership are sooner or later visible and comprehensible for everyone.

Sources:

my own observations towards life